Donald Trump’s next auto-industry target could be Canada

General discussion
Post Reply
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:59 am

Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:15 pm

Donald Trump’s next auto-industry target could be Canada
When it comes to vehicles, the U.S.’s trade gap north of the border is actually larger than its imbalance with Mexico.

By KYLE STOCK Bloomberg
Thu., Jan. 19, 2017

NEW YORK—Donald Trump’s Twitter-fueled bid to crimp free trade in the auto industry began with a warning to Detroit’s Big Three about building factories south of the border. Later, he fired off threats to German automakers — specifically BMW, which is far along in completing a plant in San Luis Potosi, Mexico, that’s set to churn out 150,000 cars a year.

But as the Republican president-elect takes office this week — and potentially makes good on a promised 35-per-cent tariff on vehicle imports — some sizable auto industry targets for his Internet ire remain.

Load up the 140-character word cannon — here’s where Trump may be aiming next.

Blame Canada

The heart of the U.S. auto industry may be in Detroit, but much of its muscle lies across the river. All told, Ontario assembly plants have about 27,000 autoworkers, including 5,600 people assembling Chevrolet SUVs and the sporty Camaro at two General Motors plants. There’s also some 7,000 folks at two Toyota installations, stamping out Lexus RX crossovers, Corolla sedans, and RAV4 trucks.

That’s almost one assembly worker for every five in the U.S., according to labour data culled from the companies and the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. When it comes to vehicles, the U.S. trade gap with Canada is actually larger than its imbalance with Mexico — $28.6 billion (U.S.) in the first 11 months of 2016, versus $18.3 billion on the southern border.

Bits and pieces

A car itself, however, is just one product in a sprawling supply chain. The North American Free Trade Agreement more than anything else freed up the movement of parts. Anti-lock brake systems from Toluca, Mexico, and transmissions from Guelph, Ont., might come together in San Antonio to be riveted onto a Toyota Tacoma, or an Accord rolling out of the massive Honda plant in Marysville, Ohio.

Each part on a North American vehicle — be it in Canada, Mexico, or the U.S. — may have crossed borders up to eight times, according to a recent analysis from the Center for Automotive Research. Of course, names of suppliers such as Robert Bosch and Linamar Corp. don’t have as much heft in a Twitter tirade as Ford or GM, but if Trump is spending long nights in Mar-a-Lago poring through Federal Trade Commission spreadsheets, he won’t like what he sees (Trump’s representatives didn’t return requests for comment). The U.S. trade balance with Mexico for auto parts is about one-third larger than that for vehicles themselves.

Pivot to Asia

Finally, Trump could take a page from the Ronald Reagan playbook and go after Asia. On a list of the most-popular U.S. cars that aren’t made in the U.S., eight of the top 10 come from Japan-based companies. Subaru’s Forester tops the list, followed by Nissan’s Rogue.

On vehicles alone, the U.S. trade balance with Japan is almost twice as large as its gap with Mexico. South Korea, the home of Hyundai and Kia, also sends a steady and fairly one-way stream of cars to America.

A widespread 35-per-cent tariff on imported vehicles would have a chilling effect on all three of these regions. Under such a penalty, the entire U.S. auto industry might look a lot like the current market for pickups, which has faced a 25-per-cent tariff on imports since the early 1960s. When it comes to trucks, American consumers have far fewer choices than they do for something like a sedan.

The so-called chicken tax (don’t ask) has indeed pushed some foreign automakers to build plants in the U.S. Toyota makes Tacomas in Texas, for example, while Nissan Titans come out of Canton, Miss., and Honda bangs together its Ridgeline in Lincoln, Ala. But some of the biggest names in the business, including Hyundai and Volkswagen, stay out of the segment entirely. Mercedes is adding a pickup truck to its product line this year, but ironically, it has no plans to sell it in America.

All told, if the U.S. were to abolish NAFTA, it would eventually welcome some 22,000 new production jobs, according to the Center for Automotive Research. The bad news though is that the country would also lose 37,000 jobs, as vehicle prices creep up and choices and demand tick down.

“That’s a very conservative estimate,” said Kristin Dziczek, director of the Industry, Labor & Economics Group at the Center for Automotive Research. “I don’t know many people who can afford a 100-per-cent Made-in-the-U.S.A. vehicle.” ... anada.html
Post Reply